Open Banking Is Mostly Plumbing — and That's the Point
Open Banking Is Mostly Plumbing — and That's the Point
The first time I joined a working group on Open Banking, half the room was talking about "transforming the customer experience" and the other half was arguing about token expiry. Three years and a lot of regulator letters later, I'll tell you which half was actually shipping product: the token-expiry people.
The product is the contract, not the screen
Open Banking is not a feature. It is a contract — between a bank, a third party, a customer, and a regulator — that says specific data will move under specific conditions, with specific consent, and that someone will be liable when it doesn't. Most of the work is making that contract real in code.
That is why I spend more time on these things than on a polished screen:
What I look for in a backlog
Backlog grooming for an Open Banking team isn't a creative exercise. It's a triage exercise. I usually ask three questions on every story:
Why FX changed how I think about products
Before CBA, I spent two years scoping a cross-border FX payment platform at American Express. FX teaches you a humility you don't get from CRUD apps. The price moves while you're talking. The settlement window can close on you. The "edge case" is sometimes 3% of your volume on a Tuesday.
The lesson I carried into Open Banking is simple: money products are unforgiving. There is no "we'll fix it in the next sprint" when a payment lands in the wrong ledger. So you over-invest in observability, idempotency, and reconciliation — and you under-invest in cleverness.
A short summary for new POs in this space
If you are stepping into a Product Owner role on Open Banking or payments, three pieces of advice:

Paul skipped presentations and built real AI products.
Paul K Paul was part of the March 2026 cohort at Curious PM, alongside 17 other talented participants.
